5 SECONDS OF SUMMER

Michael Clifford Fires Back at Abigail Breslin's Diss Track

Stars Most Stylish Selfie of the Week

Stars Most Stylish Selfie of the Week

GMAIL BLOCKED IN CHINA

5-Minute Outfit Idea

5-Minute Outfit Idea: An Effortless, Polished Look to Try This Weekend.

Facebook suffers outage

Facebook suffers outage affecting users worldwide!! .

Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Technology. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Technology. Sort by date Show all posts

Tuesday, 19 August 2014

Government wants to make cars talk to each other

Government wants to make cars talk to each other

JOAN LOWY Associated Press

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration said Monday it is taking a first step toward requiring that future cars and light trucks be equipped with technology that enables them to warn each other of potential danger in time to avoid collisions.
A research report released by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates that the technology could eventually prevent 592,000 left-turn and intersection crashes a year, saving 1,083 lives. The agency said it will begin drafting rules to require the technology in new vehicles.
The technology uses a radio signal to continually transmit a vehicle's position, heading, speed and other information. Similarly equipped cars and trucks would receive the same information, and their computers would alert drivers to an impending collision.
A car would "see" when another car or truck equipped with the same technology was about to run a red light, even if that vehicle were hidden around a corner. A car would also know when a car several vehicles ahead in a line of traffic had made a sudden stop and alert the driver even before the brake lights of the vehicle directly in front illuminate. The technology works up to about 300 yards away.
If communities choose to invest in the technology, roadways and traffic lights could start talking to cars, as well, sending warnings of traffic congestion or road hazards ahead in time for drivers to take a detour.
The technology is separate from automated safety features using sensors and radar that are already being built into some high-end vehicles today and which are seen as the basis for future self-driving cars. But government and industry officials see the two technologies as compatible. If continuous conversations between cars make driving safer, then self-driving cars would become safer as well.
Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx called the vehicle-to-vehicle technology "the next great advance in saving lives."
"This technology could move us from helping people survive crashes to helping them avoid crashes altogether — saving lives, saving money and even saving fuel thanks to the widespread benefits it offers," Foxx said.

Wednesday, 16 July 2014

Novartis and Google to Develop 'Smart' Contact Lens

Novartis and Google to Develop 'Smart' Contact Lens


Caroline Copley
Reuters 


Swiss drugmaker Novartis has struck an agreement with Google to develop "smart" contact lenses that would help diabetics to track their blood glucose levels or restore the eye's ability to focus.

The device for diabetics would measure glucose in tear fluid and send the data wirelessly to a mobile device, Novartis said. The technology is potentially life-changing for many diabetics, who prick their fingers as many as 10 times daily to check their body's production of the sugar.

Success would allow Novartis to compete in a global blood-sugar tracking market that is expected to be worth more than $12 billion by 2017, according to research firm GlobalData. Diabetes afflicts an estimated 382 million people worldwide.


Many people with Type 1 diabetes and some with Type 2 diabetes monitor their blood glucose level to help to manage their condition and reduce the risk of health complications such as amputation and blindness.

Simon O’Neill, director of health intelligence at the charity Diabetes UK, said the field would "welcome any investment in new technology that might one day have the potential to make this easier for people or to offer them more choice".

 He added, however, that without knowing more about this technology "we have no idea how likely it is to develop into something that is routinely available or how long this might take to happen".
The second element of the Google agreement is centered on presbyopia, in which ageing eyes have trouble focusing on close objects.

 Novartis hopes the lens technology will help to restore the eye's ability to focus, almost like the autofocus on a camera.

EMBEDDED TECHNOLOGY

Non-invasive sensors, microchips and other miniaturized electronics would be embedded into the contact lenses.

Under the deal, Novartis's Alcon eyecare unit will further develop and commercialize the lens technologies designed by Google[x], the American company's development team.
Financial details were not disclosed.

The alliance comes as drugmakers explore ways for technology to reshape healthcare, helping patients to monitor their own health and lowering the costs of managing chronic diseases.

In turn, technology companies such as Apple, Samsung Electronics and Google are trying to find health-related applications for wearable devices.
Novartis Chief Executive Joe Jimenez said he hoped that a product could be on the market in about five years.

"This really brings high-technology and combines it with biology - and that's a very exciting combination for us," Jimenez told Reuters.

"I think you're going to see more and more areas of unmet medical need where companies like Novartis are going to take a non-traditional approach to addressing those needs."

Although the licensing deal is only for the eye, Jimenez said the drugmaker was also thinking about how technology could be applied in other areas, such as remote patient monitoring in heart failure.

Sunday, 12 October 2014

Samsung Electronics says it's developed faster Wi-Fi technology

Samsung Electronics says it's developed faster Wi-Fi technology

Jiyeun Lee
Bloomberg 


Samsung Electronics Co said it has developed a Wi-Fi technology that can increase data transmission speeds by five times the maximum rate possible with existing consumer electronics devices.

The 60 GHz Wi-Fi technology will enable a 1 gigabyte movie to be transferred between devices in less than three seconds while allowing uncompressed high-definition videos to be streamed in real time, the Suwon, South Korea-based company said in an e-mailed statement today.

The technology removes the gap between theoretical and actual speeds, and exhibits actual speeds more than 10 times faster than with existing Wi-Fi technologies, it said.

“Samsung has successfully overcome the barriers to the commercialization” of the 60 GHz Wi-Fi technology, Kim Chang Yong, head of a Samsung research-and-development centre, said in the statement. “New and innovative changes await Samsung’s next-generation devices, while new possibilities have been opened up for the future development of Wi-Fi technology.”

The announcement came as the world’s largest smartphone maker rolls out new products amid growing competition from Apple Inc and Chinese companies.

Samsung last week said its quarterly operating profit plunged 60 per cent because of stagnating smartphone sales and has announced a 15.6 trillion won ($14.5 billion) investment to build a plant in South Korea to meet demand for semiconductor chips.

Samsung said commercialization of the 60 GHz Wi-fi technology is expected as early as next year. It plans to apply its new Wi-Fi technology to a wide range of products, including audio-visual and medical devices, and telecommunication equipment.

Tuesday, 20 May 2014

Teradata Announces National IT Excellence Awards 2014

Teradata Announces National IT Excellence Awards 2014

Teradata has announced winners of the 12th Teradata National IT Excellence Awards for 2014.
Shahid Khaqan Abbasi Federal Minister for Petroleum and Natural Resources was the chief guest and Dr Syed Ismail Shah, Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) presented the winner’s trophies at a grand event on May 18 at a local hotel.
Abbasi recognised Teradata’s efforts in promotion of information technology and related professionals in Pakistan through annual recognition and awards program ever since its launch in 1997. Dr Shah acknowledged the efforts of Teradata and also congratulated the winners for achieving excellence in their respective fields.

“It is my honour to welcome the winners of the Teradata National IT Excellence Awards to the ranks of high achievers as adjudged by the panel. We are pleased to recognise their talent and achievements and to be part of their journey to further excellence,” said Khuram Rahat, Teradata managing director for Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh.
The winners of the 12th Teradata National IT Excellence Awards are:
  • Excellence in IT Business Intelligence: This award is given to an individual who has demonstrated skills in integrating a successful Business Intelligence plan within an organization and thereby increased business performance and productivity. Mr. Mohammad Rizwan Arif was the winner in this category for successfully implementing more than 250 accounting and management software programs in more than 800 organizations, including more than 300 schools. He has also released softwarefor thedigital study of Al-Qur’an.
  • Excellence in Software Development: Recognizing individuals who have demonstrated exceptional skills in developing software, which is or can be deployed both locally and internationally, the winner in this category is Mr. Sham Zia, for hisproject,“TRACK FOREVER,” an enterprise-grade vehicle-tracking and fleet management software solution.
  • Excellence in Software Export: This organizational award is given to M/S NetSol Technologies Limited,for its unique effortsresulting in achieving the highest software exports since 2004. The company realized a 22 percent growth in software exports in 2013 compared to 2012.
  • Excellence in IT Research and Development: Won by Mr. Osman Hassan for his role in developing new ideas, technology, techniques and/or products through research and development, Mr.Hassan developed the first training robot and simulator for Minimal Invasive surgery in Pakistan.He is the founder and director of System Analysis and Verification (SAVE) Lab. He has acquired over Rs. 60 million in research grants and has published over 75 papers.
  • Excellence in IT Education: This award is given to recognize a person who nurtures the IT talent in Pakistan.Winner of this category this year wasDr. Sajjad A. Madaniwho has co-prepared and presented the concept paper to establish a virtual campus for distance learning at COMSATS institute of Information Technology. The concept was successfully implemented in 1.5 years. Student enrollment is now around 4000 student, innine programs undergraduate and three graduate level programs.
  • Excellence in Project Management: Given to an individual withproven qualitative and quantitative results in successful execution of projects during the period of consideration, this award wasgiven to Mr. Naeem Siraj. He demonstrated qualitative and quantitative results with the successful implementation of Retail Management System at 400 point-of-sale systems.
  • Excellence as an IT Student: This award was earned by Mr.Suleman Belal Kazi. A student at National University for Science and Technology, he has been on the Dean’s honor roll for all six semesters. Mr. Kazi placed first in the IET’s “Present around the World” Competition and was the team leader of the team that won the “Best Engineering Design” award. Those accomplishments, and his recognition as the semifinalist at the 2012 Engineering Robotics Contest held at National University for Science and Technology and his appointment as a Microsoft Student Partner for GhulamIshaq Khan Institute, have earned him this award.
  • Excellence in IT Enabled Service Offering: This award recognizes innovation in solutions offering having a direct impact towards the consumers in Pakistan, be it creating convenience or related to raising the bar in the service industry with respect to the technology solution. This year it was given to three individuals involved in two projects. Mr. Ahmad Saeed andDr. Bilal Zaka were awarded for their IT-enabled servicethroughPakWheels,the community-based automobile website.Mr.BilalZakawon for earning his Ph.D. in Computer Science and graduating with distinction from Graz University of Technology in Austria, and for consulting to Higher Education Commissionfor running learning-management-systems in 15 universities.
  • CIO of the Year: This category recognizes individual leadership and thought innovation in technology applications within an organization. Dr. Sarfraz Alam was given this award in appreciation of his high contributions as Chief Information Officer forTEXPO Pakistan (Private) Limited. Under his dynamic leadership, more than 100 engineers have been developed, and the first satellite tracking ground stations for United Arab Emirates have been developed.
  • Lifetime Achievement Award: In recognition for having spent his entire career in promoting IT in Pakistan, this award was given to Mr. Shahid Mahmud. Heis a Member of Corporate Advisory Council (CAC), the National University of Science and Technology for IT and Telecom, and a member of the NUST Alumni Advisory Council. Mr. Mahmudis the founder of PAKTEL, the first cellular company of Pakistan, where he remained a Director on the company’s board till 1998. In 2001, he was selected to take part in the prestigious Eisenhower Fellowship program on leadership, in the United States of America.
Nominations for awards were received by independent auditors KPMG Taseer Hadi and Co. Seven judges evaluated the nominations on the basis supporting documents. The compiled results were later announced by the auditors.
Judges for the 12th Teradata National IT Excellence Awards were:
  • Dr Abdul Wahab, President Mohammad Ali Jinnah University,
  • Professor Dr Ziauddin Zia, Head of Computer Science Department, COMSATS Vihari,
  • Dr Arshad Ali DG NUST SEECS Islamabad,
  • Brigadier Saleem Ahmed Moeen (Retd), CEO, SecureTech Consultancy Pvt Ltd,
  • Nooruddin Baqai, Advisor PTCL,
  • Ms Jehan Ara, President P@SHA Pakistan Software Houses Association for IT and ITeS,
  • Salman Ansari, CEO, Salman Ansari Technologies

Saturday, 13 September 2014

Cars that drive themselves starting to chat with each other

Cars that drive themselves starting to chat with each other

By Ben Klayman, Bernie Woodall and Paul Lienert
Reuters

DETROIT — An Acura RLX sedan demonstrated an unusual way to tow another car this week: the vehicles were not physically attached. The second car drove itself, following instructions beamed over by the first in a feat of technology that indicates a new stage in automation is happening faster than many expected.

Systems that enable vehicles to communicate with each other have been developed in recent years in parallel with features that enable cars to drive themselves. Manufacturers and suppliers now are putting the two together in novel ways, with broad implications for vehicle safety and convenience.
General Motors Co., Honda Motor Co., which owns Acura, and other automakers are working with traditional suppliers and startup firms. Tech giants Google, with its pioneering work on driverless cars, and Apple, which is working with automakers to embed greater connectivity in their cars, are accelerating the change.

"It is the mix of big companies — Apple, Google, the automakers and the data aggregators — that starts to create momentum. Two years ago, it was different. It was a promise. Today, it’s reality," said Laurens Eckelboom, executive vice president of business development at Parkmobile, a smart-parking startup whose investors include BMW AG and Ford Motor Chairman Bill Ford's venture capital firm Fontinalis Partners.

A "truck platooning" application by Peloton Technology, a startup based in California's Silicon Valley, is intended to save fuel and reduce collisions.
As with virtual towing, a "platoon" of two heavy trucks use wireless communication and computer-controlled braking and acceleration to keep in close formation on the highway, according to a description by the company, which expects to start selling the technology late next year at $2,000 per truck plus a share of the projected operating savings.

The total price tag for widespread adaption of such features could be steep. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates automakers will need to spend billions of dollars to install safety systems that automatically assist drivers and could be mandated by 2020, when the industry expects the first self-driving cars to start easing onto roads.

WHO IS LIABLE?

There are other risks and issues including reliability, cybersecurity and legal liability.
"What happens if a self-driving car gets into an accident? Who is liable for the damages? Will the human ‘copilot’ be at fault or will the car’s manufacturer?" the Center for Insurance Policy and Research wrote last month, citing "a long list of safety and legal issues to iron out before self-driving cars hit the road.”

All the razzle-dazzle technology promised by automakers and regulators "shouldn't take our eyes off the prize — cars that don't crash," Jon Lauckner, GM's chief technology officer, said at the Intelligent Transport Systems World Congress in Detroit this week.
Citi analyst Itay Michaeli said the convergence of connected and automated technologies also has the potential to reduce vehicle emissions and fuel usage, and bring down vehicle operating and insurance costs.

Active safety, including hands-free driver assistance and accident avoidance, was a common thread of many technical discussions and technology advances on display at the ITS show, which attracted 10,000 engineers, scientists and researchers, ending on Thursday.

Automakers are starting to put more of the new technologies on the road "to get some experience and see how the market reacts in advance of the government requiring it," said Jeff Owens, Delphi Automotive chief technology officer.

Price is still a big question. Some advanced systems could cost two to three times more to develop than early adopters are likely to pay, several industry insiders estimated in conversations at the show.
Even with just a few semi-automated systems installed, the price tag remains stiff, although recent studies have shown car buyers are willing to pay about $3,000 to have hands-free driving capability.
The Chrysler Group, a unit of Italy’s Fiat SpA, is charging nearly $3,500 for a technology bundle on its new 2015 Chrysler 200C sedan that includes adaptive cruise control, which automatically applies brakes and throttle to keep a vehicle a safe distance behind the one ahead; lane departure warning with lane keep assist, which automatically redirects a vehicle that is drifting out of its traffic lane; blind spot and cross path detection, which helps the driver monitor the presence of vehicles, and automatic park assist.

GM's Cadillac brand hasn't said how much its new Smart Cruise system will cost when it debuts in about two years. The system is designed to enable hands-free driving on the freeway with automatic steering, braking and throttle, as well as using GM's OnStar system to provide location, weather and traffic information to the automated systems.

But drivers should not expect to take a snooze. "We are talking about 'automated' driving features, not autonomous driving," with Smart Cruise, warned spokesman Jim Cain. "We will have strategies in place to keep the driver alert and engaged."

Saturday, 18 October 2014

Disney rendered its new animated film on a 55,000-core supercomputer

Disney rendered its new animated film on a 55,000-core supercomputer

Joseph Volpe
Engadget


Disney's upcoming animated film Big Hero 6, about a boy and his soft robot (and a gang of super-powered friends), is perhaps the largest big-budget mash-up you'll ever see. Every aspect of the film's production represents a virtual collision of worlds. The story, something co-director Don Hall calls "one of the more obscure titles in the Marvel universe," has been completely re-imagined for parent company Disney. Then, there's the city of San Fransokyo it's set in -- an obvious marriage of two of the most tech-centric cities in the world. And, of course, there's the real-world technology that not only takes center stage as the basis for characters in the film, but also powered the onscreen visuals. It's undoubtedly a herculean effort from Walt Disney Animation Studios, and one that's likely to go unnoticed by audiences.

"We've said it many, many times. We made the movie on a beta renderer," says Hank Driskill, technical supervisor for Big Hero 6. "It was very much in progress." Driskill is referring to Hyperion, the software Disney created from the ground up to handle the film's impressive lighting. It's just one of about three dozen tools the studio used to bring the robotics-friendly world of San Fransokyo to life. Some, like the program Tonic originally created for Rapunzel's hair in Tangled, are merely improved versions of software built for previous efforts, or "shows" as Disney calls them. Hyperion, however, represents the studio's greatest and riskiest commitment to R&D in animation technology thus far. And its feasibility wasn't always a sure thing, something Disney's Chief Technology Officer Andy Hendrickson underscores when he says, "It's the analog to building a car while you're driving it."


For that reason, Hendrickson instructed his team to embark on two development paths for Big Hero 6: the experimental Hyperion and a Plan B that hinged on a commodity renderer. It took a team of about 10 people over two years to build Hyperion, during which time Driskill says resources were being spread thin: "We were running with a backup plan until around June of last year ... [and] we realized we were spending too much energy keeping the backup plan viable. It was detracting in manpower ... from pursuing the new idea as fully as we could. So we just said, 'We're gonna go for it.' And we turned off the backup plan."

Hyperion, as the global-illumination simulator is known, isn't the kind of technology that would excite the average moviegoer. As Hendrickson explains, it handles incredibly complex calculations to account for how "light gets from its source to the camera as it's bouncing and picking up colors and illuminating other things." This software allowed animators to eschew the incredibly time-consuming manual effort to animate single-bounce, indirect lighting in favor of 10 to 20 bounces simulated by the software. It's responsible for environmental effects -- stuff most audiences might take for granted, like when they see Baymax, the soft, vinyl robot featured in the film, illuminated from behind.That seemingly mundane lighting trick is no small feat; it required the use of a 55,000-core supercomputer spread across four geographic locations.


Disney Animation CTO Andy Hendrickson demonstrates Hyperion's real-world lighting simulation.
"This movie's so complex that humans couldn't actually handle the complexity. We have to come up with automated systems," says Hendrickson. To manage that cluster and the 400,000-plus computations it processes per day (roughly about 1.1 million computational hours), his team created software called Coda, which treats the four render farms like a single supercomputer. If one or more of those thousands of jobs fails, Coda alerts the appropriate staffers via an iPhone app.

To put the enormity of this computational effort into perspective, Hendrickson says that Hyperion "could render Tangled from scratch every 10 days."

If that doesn't drive the power of Disney's proprietary renderer home, then consider this: San Fransokyo contains around 83,000 buildings, 260,000 trees, 215,000 streetlights and 100,000 vehicles (plus thousands of crowd extras generated by a tool called Denizen). What's more, all of the detail you see in the city is actually based off assessor data for lots and street layouts from the real San Francisco. As Visual Effects Supervisor Kyle Odermatt explains, animating a city that lively and massive simply would not have been possible with previous technology. "You couldn't zoom all the way out [for a] wide shot down to just a single street level the way we're able to," he says.

Beyond the supercomputer cluster and software tools devised to make the movie, Big Hero 6 leans heavily on cutting-edge technology for its visual majesty in one other way: its characters. Both Baymax, the aforementioned, lovable robot sidekick and the microbots, swarm-like mini-drones controlled by telepathy, are steeped in some very real scientific research. That decision to ground the world of Big Hero 6 in near-future technologies led Hall and co-director Chris Williams on research trips to MIT, Harvard and Carnegie Mellon in the US and even to Tokyo University in Japan.
A soft robotic arm developed by researchers at Carnegie Mellon University.
"You know, we try to look at, like, five to 10 years down the road at what was coming ... It seems counterintuitive because in animation you can do anything, but it still has to be grounded in a believable world," says Hall.

Indeed, there's even a moment where supergenius lead character Hiro Hamada uses a 3D printer in his garage to create an outfit for Baymax. In discussing the scene, Roy Conli, the film's producer, credits the "maker movement that's going on right now." He adds, "These kids are makers. So it's a little bit the celebration of the nerd."

It was during a visit to Carnegie Mellon that Hall came across researcher Chris Atkeson, who'd been working in the field of inflatable, soft robotics; robots intended for the health care industry. Hall says Atkeson pleaded with him to "make a movie where the robot is not the villain." But Atkeson didn't have to do much convincing -- Hall's vision for Baymax meshed nicely with his research. He'd wanted a robot audiences hadn't seen on screen before. Hall continues, "The minute I saw this [research], I knew that we had our huggable robot. I knew that we had found Baymax."

The team also drew inspiration for Baymax from existing compassionate-care tech out of Japan. "They're a little ahead of the curve," Hall says. "I mean, [health care robots] are actually in practice in some of the hospitals in Japan. They're not vinyl; they're not Baymax. They're plastic robotics."
The high-tech city of San Fransokyo represents a mash-up of eastern and western culture.
Robotics research out of Carnegie Mellon also provided the basis for the unwitting pawns of the film: the Lego-like, mind-controlled microbots. Of course, the version we see in the film is a much more fantastical approach to the simple, water-walking bots Hall's team glimpsed during their visit. That, coupled with a heavy dose of inspiration from swarm-drone tech, led to the insect-like creepiness of the microbots in the final film.

By design, the electromagnetic microbots move as if part of a chain: Each individual "link" travels from front to back to propel the swarm forward in a circuit-board-like pattern. On average, the visual effects team says there are about 20 million microbots onscreen in a given shot, and that level of complexity is where Hyperion once again comes crucially into play. Originally, however, the team didn't think its full vision of the microbots would even be possible to render.

"We thought the technology would never actually be able to handle it happening in all of the shots," explains Head of Effects Michael Kaschalk. "And to do that from shot to shot, that takes artists' work to just be able to create the [lighting] cheat. But as Hyperion developed, and we actually built the system, we found that it was handling all of this data just fine. So we actually built the real thing."
Hiro scans Baymax to create 3D-printed armor.

Though tech innovation clearly plays an important role in development at Disney Animation Studios, it's not the sole guiding force for each film and, for that matter, neither is the story. The studio's process is entirely collaborative. "We are looking for input from everybody that works here for storytelling ... there's no doubt that those ideas can rise up from anywhere to become a big piece or small piece of the story," says Odermatt. There's no one single source of motivation other than a love of research and functional design -- key concepts imparted by Chief Creative Officer John Lasseter.
"The movie does celebrate science and technology in a way that we haven't really done before."

In a way, Big Hero 6 is a love letter to technology. It's a fantasy film that gives audiences a knowing wink toward the robot-assisted near-future, as if to say, "This is exactly where you're headed. And it's coming soon." Big Hero 6 also represents a perfect storm for Disney: The subject matter (makers and robotics) and setting (hyper-tech San Fransokyo) dovetailed with the economic feasibility of cutting-edge computational hardware (that massive render farm) and the development of advanced animation techniques (Hyperion). It's a film for, by and from lovers of technology.

That Big Hero 6 has a technological heart and soul is not lost on Hall. In fact, he's keenly aware of this. "The movie does celebrate science and technology in a way that we haven't really done before."

Wednesday, 23 July 2014

How Wearable Technology Made Carmelo Anthony a Tech Investor

How Wearable Technology Made Carmelo Anthony a Tech Investor
The idea that turned Carmelo Anthony into a venture capitalist came to him during practice with the New York Knicks last season.
The basketball star became interested in the sophisticated sensors that players had recently started wearing to track their performance, said Stuart Goldfarb, a former executive at NBC and Bertelsmann who is a friend of Anthony's. The devices, made by companies like Catapult Sports of Australia, were not broadly available to consumers.
"We started talking about how sensor-based devices available to consumers were really primitive," Goldfarb said.
"Sensors were bound to get much better and had the ability to disrupt the whole health care system," he added. "But for them to work well and become adopted, they really had to become lifestyle-type products. We wanted to participate in that."
The result of that brainstorm was a venture capital partnership between Anthony and Goldfarb that they unveiled Monday. Their firm, called M7 Tech Partners, has a broader mandate than just wearable technology, with plans to invest also in digital media and other consumer technology companies.
Reflecting that scope, the first investment by M7 - whose name is a nod to Anthony's nickname, Melo, and his jersey number - is in a startup called Hullabalu that makes storytelling apps for children. Goldfarb declined to say how much M7 invested in Hullabalu, but he noted that Anthony was drawn to the company because he has a young son.
The two partners each bring different strengths to the new firm, Goldfarb said. While Goldfarb has an operational and marketing background, Anthony could theoretically use his celebrity to help promote a startup's product.
They are using their own money to invest, though Goldfarb declined to say how much. The capital, he said, comes equally from the two men. They spent the summer looking at "dozens of companies," and they expect to announce their next investment later this week, he said.
Wearable technology has become a hot topic in Silicon Valley recently, as companies like Samsungand Pebble have released "smart" watches. In a statement, Anthony emphasized his interest in the wearable technology sector.
"We are actively looking for ventures with strong leaders creating breakthrough products that resonate with consumers," Anthony said. "I particularly have my eye on companies that are involved with wearable technology and connected devices - these will be huge areas for the future." 
© 2014 New York Times News Service

Thursday, 21 August 2014

New Era in Safety When Cars Talk to One Another

New Era in Safety When Cars Talk to One Another

AARON M. KESSLER
The New York Times 


ANN ARBOR, Mich. — A driver moves along in traffic, the forward view blocked by a truck or a bend in the road. Suddenly, up ahead, someone slams on the brake. Tires screech.
There is little time to react.
Researchers here are working to add time to that equation. They envision a not-too-distant future in which vehicles are in constant, harmonious communication with one another and their surroundings, instantly warning drivers of unseen dangers.
When a motorist brakes quickly, a careless driver runs a red light or a truck bears down unseen in a passing lane, dashboards in nearby cars light up immediately with warnings — providing additional reaction time to avoid a pileup.

The Transportation Department announced this week a plan to require in coming years that the technology, so-called vehicle-to-vehicle communication, be installed in all cars and trucks in the United States. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx called it “the next great advance in saving lives.”
Google may already be experimenting with its own driverless cars, but the technology being tested in this university town by a group of academic, industry and government researchers could be retrofitted into ordinary cars.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates that vehicle-to-vehicle transmitters will add only about $350 to the total cost of a vehicle by 2020. The safety agency expects prices to fall as the mandate approaches, as has already happened with features like rearview cameras, which will be required in 2018. By the end of the decade, if all goes as planned, the typical American vehicle will be part of a network, constantly sharing information as it travels.

At a government-sponsored pilot program here in Ann Arbor, being run by the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, nearly 3,000 vehicles driven by volunteers are being tested in real-world conditions. Transmitters in the vehicles send and receive information 10 times a second: speed, direction, location and other data that automakers and federal regulators hope will usher in a new era of road safety.
Drivers today can buy cars that monitor blind spots, warn them when they veer out of a lane and even park themselves. Such features are overseen by sensors inside the car: cameras, radar and lasers that scan the road like electronic eyes.

Like any pair of eyes, however, they can warn about only what they can see. The technology developing in Ann Arbor focuses on hazards even electronic eyes can’t spot.
“If there are several vehicles between you and the one that’s panic-braking, you may not even be aware of it,” said Debby Bezzina, assistant program manager for the University of Michigan experiment. “You definitely can’t see their taillights.”
The wireless technology goes beyond cars talking to other cars. It also allows the roads themselves to communicate — not just about traffic jams or road work, but whether there is black ice ahead, for instance.
Even traffic lights can be part of the network.
On a recent summer morning, Ms. Bezzina pointed to the digital display in a university test vehicle as it drove through Ann Arbor’s model deployment zone, which includes about 70 miles of roadway throughout the city, about an hour west of Detroit.
As the vehicle approached a green light, the screen showed how many seconds remained before it turned red.

“Think about how modern crosswalks show you how much time you have left to walk across the street,” she said. “It makes things safer; you’re not guessing or possibly panicking. This is the same idea, only for vehicles.”
A network of cars and traffic signals could also inform drivers what speed to travel to hit all the green lights ahead, creating a so-called greenway. That would not only ease congestion but help with fuel efficiency, too.
But it’s avoiding accidents that has federal regulators most interested.
Ms. Bezzina demonstrated with test vehicles a common hazard: a driver stopping short. A companion car positioned itself a couple of hundred feet ahead and forcefully hit its brakes.
Instantly, a red warning signal flashed on the rearview mirror, and a loud tone sounded.
“That will certainly get your attention,” she said.
The Ann Arbor pilot program started equipping local vehicles in 2012 with wireless transmitters, which operate on a special frequency set aside for vehicle-to-vehicle technology.
Researchers signed up nearly 3,000 volunteers in Ann Arbor, and a consortium of eight automakers joined the effort as well, bringing their own test cars.

The goal was to have a critical mass of networked vehicles in the test so that detailed data could be gathered about how, or if, the interactive systems were working. Drivers come in every few weeks to download data from hard drives stored in the trunk.
The experiment was meant to last a year, but it has been expanded to a three-year program that could soon incorporate about 9,000 local participants, including, for the first time, pedestrians carrying tiny transmitters.
A lesson automakers are learning in Ann Arbor is that if the vehicle-to-vehicle system’s warnings are going to be effective, they had better be right.

“People don’t have a lot of tolerance for things that become a nuisance,” said Jim Keller, the chief engineer overseeing connected vehicles at Honda. “What you don’t want is these things going off all the time when it’s a false alarm. You need it to only work if there’s a problem.”
But if such projects succeed, the benefits could be considerable. The Transportation Department predicts that eight out of every 10 traffic accidents involving unimpaired drivers could be prevented.
A recent report by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration put it at about 600,000 fewer crashes involving left turns or intersections, saving more than 1,000 lives annually.

Dan Flores, a General Motors spokesman, said the automaker believed the safety benefits cannot be understated.
“We’re not interested in this because it’s cool,” he said. “We think there’s a fundamental benefit where people can be safer if they have this technology.”
He added: “We believe, longer term, it will be part of the suite of technologies that will bring about a true driverless car.”
Hideki Hada, general manager of integrated vehicle systems at the Toyota Technical Center, said future vehicles would probably combine car-to-car communication with technologies like radar, creating a smart car that is capable of “360-degree awareness.”
“You can keep a car in its lane with cameras and radar, but merging, passing — these things require awareness of other cars on the highway,” Mr. Hada said. “This technology can play a significant role.”
The rapid exchanging of so much data naturally raises concerns about computer security, which until now has not been a concern for most automakers.
“It’s not sending credit card information or anything like that,” Mr. Hada said of vehicle-to-vehicle technology. “But when people hear about a wireless communications system, they care about privacy and security.”

He said some fears can be alleviated just by understanding that unlike cellphones or GPS devices, vehicle-to-vehicle communication transmitters have a range of only a few hundred yards. They are designed to talk to nearby cars and infrastructure, like a two-way radio, but don’t track movements over time or record personal information.

Making sure the new systems are secure has led automakers to welcome new kinds of specialists.
“Traditionally, we sell steel and rubber,” Mr. Hada said. “But we are now able to bring in talented people from computer science, from the world of control systems and algorithms. It’s an exciting environment.”
Many in the auto industry realize car-to-car communication is half the picture. The use of road sensors and other infrastructure will spread more slowly.

“What you want is for the infrastructure to be there and have cars roll off the lot ready to talk to these various signals,” Mr. Keller of Honda said.
But with local governments around the country facing budget pressure, “it’s not going to be that way,” he said. “So it’s going to be interesting to see how things play out.”

Wednesday, 13 August 2014

Apple, Google, VCs invest in health technology

Apple, Google, VCs invest in health technology

By Brandon Bailey
San Jose Mercury News

  It's no coincidence that archrivals Apple and Google launched competing software initiatives this summer for wearable gadgets that track fitness and health.
Health technology is hot in the Bay Area, where some of the biggest tech companies and a swarm of startups are working on everything from doctor-recommendation apps and video diagnostic services to data-crunching analytics and cutting-edge DNA sequencing.

Hoping to capitalize on the power of mobile computing, artificial intelligence and new analytics software — as well as new laws and the sense that a bloated health care industry is ripe for new efficiencies — venture capital firms and big tech companies are pouring vast sums into new medical technology.
The pending "collision of new technology and the life sciences" will bring radical change to "what health care means and what it looks like, in the next 20 years," said Bill Maris, managing partner of Google Ventures, the Internet giant's in-house investing arm.

Some entrepreneurs want to change the way people interact with doctors and insurance companies. Others believe they now have the tools to unlock the genetic secrets of health and serious disease, and to identify effective treatments by analyzing mountains of data. And some just want to help you lose a few pounds.
In just the first six months of 2014, investors put a record $2.3 billion into digital health startups — or slightly more than the $2 billion invested in all of 2013, according to a survey by Rock Health, which funds health tech companies.
Health companies are also hot on Wall Street: The Ipreo research firm counted 52 initial public offerings in the first half of 2014, compared with 53 in all of last year.
Some of the valley's commercial tech giants have dabbled in health before. Intel has long promoted its processors for specialized devices that monitor patients at home and in clinical settings. Hewlett-Packard has sold commercial computer systems tailored to the needs of hospitals and biotech labs. IBM has studied public health data at its San Jose research lab.

Now, major tech companies are seeing gold in new consumer health products.
At its annual developer conference in June, Apple introduced a new "Health" app for tracking a user's heart rate, sleep patterns, calorie intake and other health metrics. Apple also launched "Health Kit," an Internet platform for app developers that can store data from different devices and share it with a user's doctor or health system. Three weeks later, Google announced its own initiative, called "Fit," which includes developer tools and an online platform for collecting data.

Google co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin also have a long-standing interest in health research. Google Ventures is a longtime backer of 23andMe, the personal genetics startup led by Brin's wife, Anne Wojcicki. While that firm has run into regulatory hurdles, Google launched a spinoff company last fall with the ambitious aim of combating "aging and associated diseases" on a cellular level.
Meanwhile, researchers at Google's secretive X division are working on wearable medical devices, including a "smart" contact lens that monitors a wearer's glucose level. The same team is building a database of genetic and molecular information from healthy volunteers, which they hope to analyze for useful medical knowledge.
Google Ventures is backing at least a dozen other life science companies, ranging from Doctor on Demand, a consumer service that arranges online video consultations, to Flatiron Health, which is hoping to mine useful information from digitized data collected by cancer-treatment providers and researchers.

Data-driven medicine is a key element of the Affordable Care Act, the federal law that implemented President Barack Obama's health care reforms, which experts say is a major force behind the boom in new health technology. At Rock Health, managing director Malay Gandhi said he's seen the impact in two ways:
First is the wave of new online startups that provide ratings and information or help consumers find health-related services in new ways. These include startups such as San Francisco's Stride Health, a Web service that compares and recommends insurance plans, and Studio Dental, which describes itself as an "Uber for your teeth" because it lets users make appointments online with a dentist who comes to their workplace with a fully equipped van.

Second, Gandhi said, the law provides powerful financial incentives for doctors and hospitals to show the effectiveness of their care, which is sparking demand for new software to track and analyze patient data. Currently, experts believe as much as a third of health spending in the United States is wasted or unnecessary, said Ed Yu, a health industry expert at PricewaterhouseCoopers.
In yet another trend, Yu said he's seeing a wave of new Bay Area startups that help drug retailers and other companies operate "social listening" websites, where patients and their families can share information with others who are affected by a particular disease.

Surveys show many consumers still have reservations about sharing health information online. The Federal Trade Commission has also raised concerns about health apps sharing data with advertisers or other third parties.

But tech companies are working on that, too. Mountain View, Calif., startup TrueVault makes software that helps app developers meet privacy and security standards required by federal health law.
———
HEALTH TECH FUNDING
Venture capitalists poured a record $2.3 billion into digital health companies during the first half of 2014, according to a report by startup accelerator Rock Health, which identified six major types of health technology being funded:
—Digital medical devices ($206 million)
—Data collection and analytics ($196 million)
—Consumer tools for buying health care or insurance ($193 million)
—Software to help providers track patients' health and treatment effectiveness ($162 million)
—Software for tailoring treatment to patients' genetic information ($150 million)

Sunday, 24 August 2014

Google's Bumpy Road Trip

Google's Bumpy Road Trip

Alistair Barr
The Wall Street Journal

Google Inc. caused a stir earlier this year when it unveiled a self-driving car without a steering wheel, or pedals for braking and accelerating.
But Google's goal of an autonomous car is bumping up against new testing rules from California's Department of Motor Vehicles.

The rules, which take effect on Sept. 16, require a driver to be able to take "immediate physical control" of a vehicle on public roads if needed. That means the car must have a steering wheel and brake and accelerator pedals, according to Bernard Soriano, the top official developing the rules for the state.
Google could test its fully autonomous prototype on private roads, or try to test the vehicle on public roads outside California.

But the company said it plans to comply with the California rule by building a small, temporary steering-wheel and pedal system that drivers can use during testing.
"With these additions, our safety drivers can test the self-driving features while having the ability to take control of the vehicle if necessary," Google spokeswoman Courtney Hohne said.
The bump in the road shows how far Google has to travel to get fully autonomous cars on city streets and highways. The technology has to maneuver a host of obstacles, including acceptance by the general public and the issue of liability when accidents happen.

Google is particularly keen on developing a vehicle without a steering wheel and pedals because the company is gunning for the goal of a completely autonomous vehicle that can operate without any human intervention. This is a longer-term and riskier attempt than those efforts made at many car companies, which are integrating autonomous features, such as self-parking and lane-straightening, into existing vehicles.
Liability might be a bigger hurdle for the Google project than testing rules. When there is no driver, the question of who is to blame in an accident gets complicated and the possible targets of lawsuits expand. The company that designed the technology might be targeted, along with the manufacturer, the car's owner and any passengers who were riding in the vehicle at the time of an accident.

California's testing rules try to tackle these emerging liability questions by requiring that companies involved in testing self-driving vehicles have $5 million in insurance or self-insurance or a bond in the same amount.
David Hall, the chief executive of Velodyne Inc., which makes laser technology used by Google's autonomous cars, is concerned about liability risks and said California's $5 million requirement is onerous for smaller companies.

This liability risk, and the cost to insure against it, could increase the cost of Velodyne's laser devices by thousands of dollars, Mr. Hall estimated.
"Who pays when there's a crash? Who will insure us against this?" he said.

Google said it is being cautious; regulators are treading even more carefully.
Ron Medford, director of safety for Google's car project, asked the California DMV earlier this year to allow other types of autonomous vehicles, such as motorcycles and trucks, to be tested. The state declined.
"We wanted to take baby steps in terms of testing and how technology is rolled out so we are capable of handling it and Californians accept it," Mr. Soriano said.

Google is making about 100 of its prototype autonomous cars. It caps their speed at 25 mph to make them easier to handle and limit damage if an accident occurs. Testing on private roads is expected to start next month and will include the temporary manual controls, Google said.

The company hopes it can put ordinary Californians in autonomous cars for test runs on public roads in a couple of years. State officials are drafting rules for those tests, which would allow cars without steering wheels or pedals, Mr. Soriano said.

Google has discussed using these pilots to test different ways of deploying the technology, including as a taxi or courier service, Mr. Soriano added.

Claire Hughes Johnson, an executive in the Google Self-Driving Car Project, said in a speech in July that the technology could be valuable if it is provided as a service.

"What if you all got here today in a self-driving car that dropped you off and then left?" she asked the audience. "So you may not be able to buy one, but you may be able to drive in one in the next five years."

Wednesday, 13 August 2014

With sharp focus, quantum dot makers scale up to meet demand

With sharp focus, quantum dot makers scale up to meet demand

By Soham Chatterjee and Lehar Maan
Reuters

- When Amazon.com Inc was developing its most advanced tablet to date, it asked a little-known company to solve a tricky problem with the screen: how to produce rich colors without draining battery life.
With the help of Milpitas, California-based Nanosys Inc, the Kindle Fire HDX 7 became one of Amazon's best-selling tablets, winning critical acclaim for its vibrant display.
The answer? Quantum dots, which are semiconductor crystals 10,000 times finer than a human hair. They convert electrical energy into light and can be manipulated to produce precise colors.
"If you put a regular LCD display next to a quantum-dot LCD display, your grandmother can tell the difference," said Jason Carlson, chief executive officer of QD Vision Inc, which makes quantum dots for Sony Corp's Triluminos TV.

So explosive is demand for this technology that the few companies able to make quantum dots are struggling to keep up. Most are partnering with big display makers to set up industrial-scale manufacturing.
QD Vision and Nanosys are considering going public in the next year or so.
But while quantum dots are cheaper and consume less power than organic light-emitting diodes (OLED), their rival technology at the sharp end of the display business, they cannot yet be produced in the same quantities.

Quantum dots from most suppliers also contain cadmium, a toxic metal whose use is restricted in many countries.
A recent survey by DisplayMate Technologies rated Amazon's Kindle Fire display as the clear winner in color reproduction against Apple Inc's iPad mini and Google Inc's Nexus 7. (http://bit.ly/1tn58ze)
Smartphone and TV consumers also like quantum dots for their low price. A 65-inch quantum-dot display TV would cost about $3,500, half as much as an OLED-display model of the same size, said Nutmeg Consultants founder Ken Werner.

Werner said quantum dots would retain that pricing advantage for at least three years.
For that reason, the OLED market cannot match the growth rates forecast for quantum dots.
Touch Display Research analyst Jennifer Colegrove said she expected a $9.6 billion market for quantum-dot displays and lighting components by 2023, compared with sales of just $75 million last year. (http://bit.ly/1mceJ7j)
By contrast, Transparency Market Research projects annual sales of OLED displays at $25.9 billion by 2018 versus $4.9 billion in 2012.

QUANTUM LEAP
Although quantum dots have been in development since the 1980s, they have only made the leap from laboratory to market in the last decade.
Nanosys shelved its plan to go public in 2004 for want of a viable product. Now the company says an initial public offering is its next step.
Lexington, Massachusetts-based QD Vision considers an IPO to be a possibility in 2015, Carlson said.
Two other quantum dot makers plan to shift their listings to larger exchanges, their CEOs told Reuters. Nanoco Group Plc will move to the London Stock Exchange from the bourse's AIM, and San Marcos, Texas-based Quantum Materials Corp will go to the New York Stock Exchange or Nasdaq from over the counter.

To supply the volumes needed for large-scale manufacturing, QD Vision has partnered with LG Display Co Ltd, while Nanosys has a manufacturing partnership with a unit of 3M Co.
The shift from OLED technology toward quantum dots has been especially prevalent in TV, where OLED panels have proven expensive for large screens.
Sony and Panasonic Corp, Japan's two largest consumer electronics companies, in December announced an end to their joint development of OLED TV screens.

PATENT POWER
Patents on the technology used to make quantum dots will make it tough for new entrants to unseat existing producers, said IHS Technology analyst Brian Bae.
Apple last year filed patents on quantum-dot technology, but they involve improving the brightness and quality of displays rather than manufacturing.
Even cadmium, which the European Union and other countries restrict for use in electrical and electronic equipment, may not be much of a problem.

Oeko-Institut, an independent research institute hired by the EU, has recommended that quantum dots be exempt from wider legislation on hazardous substances until July 1, 2017, provided the cadmium content per square millimeter of display screen is below 0.2 micrograms.
That is above what is contained in displays with Nanosys and QD Vision's technologies.
For Nanoco, however, the prospect of stricter regulation beyond 2017 might be an advantage. It is the only producer of cadmium-free quantum dots and has recently doubled capacity at its Runcorn plant in northwest England.

The company has a licensing deal with a unit of Dow Chemical Co, which holds exclusive worldwide rights for the sale of its quantum dots for use in electronic displays.
Nanoco CEO Michael Edelman said Dow Electronic Materials had "the engineering strength and muscle to scale into the volumes that are necessary - and quickly."

Monday, 29 September 2014

Coming Soon to the Library: Humanoid Robots

Coming Soon to the Library: Humanoid Robots

Loretta Waldman
The Wall Street Journal



WESTPORT, Conn.—They have blinking eyes and an unnerving way of looking quizzically in the direction of whoever is speaking. They walk, dance and can talk in 19 different languages. About the height of a toddler, they look like bigger, better-dressed cousins of Buzz Lightyear.
And soon, "Vincent" and "Nancy" will be buzzing around the Westport Library, where officials next week will announce the recent acquisition of the pair of humanoid "NAO Evolution" robots. Their primary purpose: to teach the kind of coding and computer-programming skills required to animate such machines.

While it isn't unusual for public libraries to offer instruction in programming or robotics, Westport is the first in the nation to do it with sophisticated humanoid bots made by the French robotics firm Aldebaran. In a brief demonstration last week, Alex Giannini, the library's digital-experience manager, had Vincent kicking a small soccer ball, doing tai chi and taking bows.
"Robotics is the next disruptive technology coming into our lives and we felt it was important to make it accessible to people so they could learn about it," said Maxine Bleiweis, executive director of the Westport Library. "From an economic-development perspective and job- and career-development perspective, it's so important."

Under Ms. Bleiweis's leadership, Westport has made it a priority to provide public access to innovative new technology. For example, Westport was among the first public libraries in Connecticut to acquire a 3-D printer three years ago, and to create a "maker" space, an area where patrons of all ages can try out equipment, dabble in computer coding or work individually, or collaboratively, to create DIY technology.

Westport isn't the only public library with robots. In May, the Chicago Public Library, in partnership with Google Inc., made 500 "Finch" robots available to patrons at six of its branches. The dot-eyed, half-domed machines, the size of dinner plate on wheels, are also used to teach computer programming and coding.

Aldebaran said it has sold about 6,000 robots world-wide, mostly to museums and schools. At nearly $8,000 a machine, the NAO Evolution models, which were acquired by Westport with private funds, cost considerably more than the Finch machines, which run $99 each.
But the Aldebaran robots are also more complex—equipped with two cameras, four microphones, motion sensors and sonar to detect walls.

Vincent and Nancy can recognize faces and detect where sound is coming from. They have a "fall manager" that helps them right themselves after a tumble just as a human might, grunts and all. They can even "touch" and "feel" with the help of tactile and pressure sensors.

The robots come equipped with programming software, but embedded within that software are compatible programming languages, such as Python, that can be used to expand the capabilities of the NAO bots. Aldebaran also has a large development community continuously adding new behavior apps that facilitate everything from high-five gestures to a "wake-up" routine including yawning and stretching.

"They look like Sharper Image playthings, but they're insanely complicated," said Mr. Giannini.
The library plans to debut the robots Oct. 11 and begin programs and workshops soon after that will introduce participants to the software, said Bill Derry, the library's assistant director for innovation. After that, he said, he is planning a series of competitive programming challenges requiring contestants to have the robots recite a poem, give a speech and do a dance, among other things. Winners in each category will compete in a final competition at a maker fair in April.

"What we're counting on is that there is great capacity for growth that will give patrons a chance to play with something resembling artificial intelligence," said Mr. Derry. "Our goal is to push it as far as we can and shed light on people who are thinking, experimenting and producing to inspire them to go even farther."

While some have speculated that the Internet would render public libraries irrelevant, librarians say the proliferation of technology and digitized information has had the opposite effect. According to a 2013 report by the Pew Research Center, 81% of Americans say public libraries provide services they would have a hard time finding elsewhere.

The growing emphasis in schools on science, technology, engineering and math gives library-based robots added relevance.

"3-D printing and robotics are very visceral and really speak to what's possible in the future," said Matt Latham, program and maker-space coordinator at the Hoboken, N.J. public library. "It spurs creative wonder about what we can do with technology."

Mr. Giannini envisions the robots being programmed for "practical stuff" as well, such as helping patrons locate books or greeting elementary-school groups that visit the library.

"I don't know what the coolest functionality is going to be," said Mr. Giannini. "Someone coming in off the street is probably going to teach us that." 

Sunday, 16 November 2014

The iPhone Case That Can Call the Police

The iPhone Case That Can Call the Police

John Tierney
The Atlantic



A startup company in Pittsburgh called Lifeshel is working on technology designed to enable people facing assault or other emergencies to contact police in the smartest and fastest way possible. Their first product is a smartphone case and accompanying app that together provide what seems to be a promising deterrent technology.

Yes, I'm aware—and so are the young men who founded this company—that the problem of assault, especially sexual assault, in this country is a deep one that can only be solved by fundamental cultural shifts and changes in attitude. But that sort of change takes time, and in the meantime technology could provide some assistance to those in need.
Article Continues Below 
The Lifeshel case, called a Whistl, fits over a user’s smartphone and is activated by buttons on the outside of the case. When those buttons are pressed, the device emits an alert of 120 decibels, which the company says is the equivalent of being in the front row at a concert. The sound can be heard easily up to 300 feet away. The button also activates a strobing LED that’s designed to disorient an attacker and call attention to the location of the attack.

Bluetooth technology embedded in the case sends distress signals through the app to law-enforcement authorities and pre-programmed emergency contacts, notifying them of the location and providing identifying information. And to top it all off the buttons activate video and audio recording through the app, with the aim, the company says, of reducing “he-said-she-said confusion in the aftermath” of an attack.

There's also a "check-in" feature that monitors the user's safety. It checks in at pre-set intervals, essentially asking "Are you okay?" If the user doesn't click the buttons on the case, or signals, "No," the device automatically contacts the police. People who have tried test models use the check-in feature frequently when they're walking home late at night from a party or a movie or go for a run at night. The company says their users like having that extra layer of security.

Lifeshel is working on another app that will provide users with a safe community of first responders—trusted friends or other network users who may be nearby and able to respond more quickly and compassionately than the police.

I came across Lifeshel when I was in Pittsburgh in September for our American Futures reporting series.* I had gone to the East Liberty offices of AlphaLab Gear, a hardware and robotics startup accelerator that is part of Innovation Works, the region's largest and most active investor in seed-stage companies. I wanted to talk with the leadership there about their operation and about the booming tech sector in Pittsburgh. (I’ll be writing soon about AlphaLab and Innovation Works.)

As I was leaving after a productive interview, Ilana Diamond, managing director of AlphaLab Gear, introduced me to Jayon Wang, the young founder and CEO of Lifeshel. He is a 2013 mechanical-engineering graduate of Carnegie Mellon University (CMU). The other co-founder still with the company is Alan Fu, also a 2013 graduate of CMU; his degree was in Materials Science.

They got to know each other in 2009 when they lived on the same dormitory floor at CMU, where—as at almost every other college in America—campus safety has become a prominent concern in the past few years. Wang told me that he, Fu, and Ramos “knew people on campus who had been sexually assaulted, whose cases were never properly resolved because there was no evidence, there was no concrete data that showed when something happened and how it happened.”

In fact, they drew their inspiration directly from the experience of Leah Yingling, a friend of theirs from CMU, who was attacked one day on a running trail in broad daylight in her hometown of Johnstown, PA, and somehow managed, during the attack, to unlock her phone and dial 911, which sounded an alert and led her attacker to flee.

When it comes to assault, and particularly sexual assault, Yingling's attack is a bit unusual. Most women aren't assaulted by strangers or in public. In fact, according to the Rape, Abuse and Incest National Network two thirds of sexual assaults are committed by someone the victim knows. And in many of those cases, victims fear alerting anybody to their abuse, lest their partner escalate the attacks. In these cases a flashing, screaming iPhone case won't help. But in the small percentage of cases in which the attack is in public and coming from a stranger, the case could provide at least a feeling of safety, if not help a potential victim.

Wang hopes the technology Lifeshel is developing will “shift the needle” in favor of those assaulted by giving them the means to collect footage and transmit a call for help instantaneously to police. The crucial advantage this technology confers is the ability to activate the system without unlocking the phone. At the same time, it has been designed so that it is very difficult to set off an alarm accidentally. But if that were to happen, the user has a self-selected window of time (say, 30 seconds) to disable the alarm before police are notified. Deactivating the panic mode requires a personalized security gesture or ID combination, so only the owner is able to deactivate the alarm.

Lifeshel’s cases won’t be available for purchase until the first or second quarter of 2015, but the company has “established interested communities of consumers through our pre-orders, product testing, and relationships with community-service groups.” For example, they tested a 20-unit network this past year on CMU’s campus, with the assistance of administrators and campus police, to whom the units were distributed. The test was successful. Users were pleased by the sense of security the device provided. The next test will be a 50-unit network used by CMU students.

In addition, Wang and his colleagues have established a strong partnership with Pittsburgh Action Against Rape (PAAR), a victim-service agency and rape-crisis program that has been active since 1972. Wang says the relationship with PAAR has enabled a conversation between the company and sexual-assault victims that allows them to create products designed with special attention to the interests and needs of people who have experienced sexual assault.

For now, the Whistl and Capsi are being developed for the iPhone 5 and 6, with Android versions to come later.


Monday, 25 August 2014

LG bets on pricey OLED technology as future of TVs

LG bets on pricey OLED technology as future of TVs

YOUKYUNG LEE
 Associated Press

LG Electronics Inc. announced two new giant OLED TVs with ultra-high definition screens Monday, sticking with its strategy of using the exceptionally expensive OLED display technology.
The South Korean company said it will ship 65-inch OLED TVs starting September in South Korea, Europe and North America. A 77-inch model will hit shelves later this year.
While major TV makers are pushing to make ultra HD TVs mainstream, they use LCD screens. The super-high resolution picture, also known as 4K, packs four times more pixels than regular HD televisions.
Making ultra HD quality TVs with OLED screens remain costly. LG's 65-inch model will cost 12 million won ($11,765). Other types of ultra HD televisions sell for less than $3,000.
OLED features deeper color saturation and a sharper image quality than LCD. But for years, its cost and high production error rate prevented the technology from catching on among mainstream consumers.
LG said it is committed to OLED because the cost will come down and its advanced screen will eventually replace LCD screens. It forecasts that OLED TV sales will overtake LCD TV sales "within a few years."
"OLED is where we must head next after PDP and LCD. It is a matter of time," Ha Hyun-hwoi, head of LG's TV business, told reporters.
LG's aggressive bet on OLED TVs is in contrast with its rival Samsung Electronics Co. After rolling out a 55-inch curved TV that uses an OLED display last year, Samsung has not announced an upgrade to its OLED TV for this year. Samsung uses OLED technology mostly for small devices, such as smartphones and tablet computers.

Saturday, 17 May 2014

3G broadband connectivity essential to sustainable development


This year’s event highlighted the importance and outreach of high speed internet throughout the world, relevant with the current scenario in Pakistan.
Ufone, realizing this importance, celebrated this event with full zest and enthusiasm, highlighting the introduction of 3G and its far reaching impact on the country.
“High-speed affordable 3G broadband connectivity to the internet is essential to sustainable development of the country and can offer widely recognized economic and social benefits,” said Asher Yaqub Khan, CCO at Ufone
Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) have gained tremendous importance worldwide; with the introduction of high speed broadband internet the importance has increased four folds,” he added. “The introduction of 3G mobile broadband in Pakistan has unleashed new horizons for the country as it enters a new digital age. But, what needs to kept in mind is that its direction should be towards sustainable development of the country.”
The importance of this technology can be deciphered from the fact that by 2018, 85% of the world’s population will have access to internet via 3G technology. The sustainable use of this technology can have wide ranging benefits.If used properly, it has the potential to boost the development and growth of a country.
Studies have shown that a 10% increase in penetration can elevate the GDP by 1%. Moreover, an increase in the broadband speed(double) can increase the GDP by 0.3%.
Khan stressing upon the importance of sustainable growth said, “The 3G mobile broadband technology and sustainable development have a deep relation, whereby amazing results can be achieved without having any negative effects.”
He added: “23rd April was a historic day for Pakistan. We re-wrote history as the country entered a new era of digital communications. This technology will open new doors of development for my fellow countrymen in the fields of mobile commerce, health, education, agriculture and provide employment to hundreds and thousands of people.”